![]() |
![]() 818 Connecticut Avenue
NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20006 Phone: 202-223-1499 Fax: 202-223-1699
Subscribe |
|
|
This topic area will be the home of postings that provide periodic updates on developments during the second half of 2006 related to the 2007 Farm Bill. While it is expected that the Senate and House Agriculture Committee will not actually begin drafting the Farm Bill until early next year, both houses of Congress already have held hearings on the matter, with more hearings scheduled this fall and winter. And, the discussion among lawmakers, Administration officials, the press, and others about the content of the new farm legislation has already started. There is a lot going on right now that the postings under this topic will try to capture.
September 18, 2006, report: The Washington guessing game. We are halfway through Congress's September session. In two weeks, members of Congress will adjourn for Fall campaigning, and not return until mid-November. The House Committee on Agriculture has been using this short late-Summer session for several hearings to receive testimony on the 2007 Farm Bill. Other than that, there is little action to report on the development of the 2007 Farm Bill. The guessing game in Washington remains the same as it has been for the past few months: Is Congress likely to use the 2007 Farm Bill process just to pass just an extension of the current farm programs (which expire at the end of the 2007 crop years), or will it strike out in new directions. And, the answer remains elusive. On the one hand, some in Congress, reflecting the views of many of their farmers who participate in the farm bill programs, have already expressed a preference for a simple extension of current programs. On the other hand, there are those (including, notably, Secretary of Agriculture Johanns) who think the farm programs need to be reshaped, either to deal with trade concerns or to "modernize" the farm programs. The trade concerns are two: First, if the Doha Round of multilateral trade negotiations get back on track, it is likely the U.S. negotiators will agree to a substantial reduction in farm bill programs in order to get other countries to commit to open their markets to U.S. agricultural products. Second, even if the Doha Round remains in suspension for the next couple of years, there are those who are worried that other countries might even now be gearing up to attack the WTO-consistency of our current programs, following the lead of the Brazilians who successfully challenged aspects of our cotton program before the WTO. They argue we should use the farm bill process to make the programs WTO-consistent. The guessing game won't be resolved soon, and likely solid clues to the eventual outcome won't surface until after the November elections. Stay tuned! |
NewsEnvironment
[11/14] NY pet cemetery ranked among Taj Mahal, pyramids Topics
BACKGROUND Recent UpdatesJune 21, 2008 June 11, 2008 May 26, 2008 May 15, 2008 May 14, 2008 ArchivesWeb ResourcesUnited States Department of Agriculture |
|
The information you obtain at this site is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation. Copyright © 2008Law Office of Phillip L. Fraas. All rights reserved. You may reproduce materials available at this site for your own personal use and for non-commercial distribution. All copies must include this copyright statement. |